
He applied the “Page 99 Test” to his new book, Fear of God: Practicing Emotion in Late Antique Monasticism, and shared the following:
Page 99 of Fear of God: Practicing Emotion in Late Antique Monasticism is part of a discussion centering on prayer spaces in Egyptian monasteries in late antiquity. At the top of the page I’ve just introduced the concept of “surface figuration” as a collective designation for the various texts, images, and other markings painted and inscribed on the walls and floors of the (now destroyed) Monastery of Apa Jeremias outside modern Cairo. The page goes on to state the argument of the book’s fourth chapter: by guiding what monks saw and how they moved their bodies while praying, the monastery’s surface figuration “afforded a particular set of relationships (and hence emotions) for its inhabitants, centering on the idea of intercession. While the overarching relational paradigm between the monastery’s inhabitants and their God remained one of future judgment, the surface figuration afforded a host of subsidiary interactions between monastics (both living and dead) and the intercessory figures whose aid they sought.”Learn more about Fear of God at the University of California Press website.
While I can’t say that this accurately encapsulates the entire book, it is a fair representation of the book’s penultimate chapter, “Spaces of Judgment and Mercy,” which focuses on the emotional lives of monks at two monasteries in Egypt in the period between the fourth and seventh centuries. The above quotation also hints at the conclusions of the book’s two main preceding chapters. First, “The Psalter as Emotional Lexicon” explores the varying emotional vocabulary of the relationship between humans and God across three ancient translations of the psalms (Greek, Coptic, and Syriac), concluding that monks reciting the psalms in all three languages (but especially Greek) encountered a vocabulary that strongly emphasized human fear over against divine pity or mercy. The other main chapter, “Scenes of Judgment,” shows how monastic writers made sense of these two emotions through the relational paradigm of judgment, leading them to foreground God’s role as eschatological judge in their writings for other monastics. These textual analyses preface the book’s engagement with monastic material culture, which shows rank-and-file monastics reacting to the fear of eschatological judgment by establishing networks of intercessional and penitential prayer on behalf of themselves and one another.
Perhaps the biggest takeaway of the book is the idea that emotions—even supposedly ineffable emotions like those involved in relationships with the divine—are thoroughly shaped by the variables of language, culture, and physical environment. Context matters. Together with this is the idea that emotions in one relational domain tend to influence emotions in other relational domains. While the book begins with the concept of fear of God, it ends with the realization that that fear itself generated profound mutual love among the members of some monastic communities in late antiquity.
--Marshal Zeringue






















