Yujin Nagasawa's "The Problem of Evil for Atheists"

Yujin Nagasawa is Professor of Philosophy and Kingfisher College Chair of the Philosophy of Religion and Ethics at the University of Oklahoma. Before joining Oklahoma, he held the H. G. Wood Professorship of the Philosophy of Religion and served as the Co-Director of the Birmingham Centre for Philosophy of Religion at the University of Birmingham, UK. Currently, he serves as Editor-in-Chief of Religious Studies, published by Cambridge University Press, and as the book series editor for Cambridge Elements in Global Philosophy of Religion. Nagasawa also served as the president of the British Society for the Philosophy of Religion from 2017 to 2019. He was the principal investigator for the Global Philosophy of Religion Project, a $2.42 million research initiative funded by the John Templeton Foundation and the Dynamic Investment Fund at the University of Birmingham, from 2020 to 2023.

Nagasawa applied the "Page 99 Test" to his new book, The Problem of Evil for Atheists, and reported the following:

Page 99 falls within Chapter 4, where I develop a version of the problem of evil for axiarchism—a novel alternative to traditional theism that posits the world exists not because God created it, but because an abstract "creatively effective ethical requirement" necessitated its existence. On that page, I explore whether axiarchists can escape the problem of evil by appealing to modal realism, which maintains that all possible worlds exist to the same extent as the actual world, with each being ontologically on a par. However, the Page 99 Test does not capture the full scope of my book, as that discussion only represents a small part of my broader argument—that the problem of evil poses a challenge for almost everyone, including theists, pantheists, axiarchists, and even atheists.

Throughout the book, I argue that traditional theists, who typically embrace supernaturalism, are better positioned to address the problem of evil than naturalist atheists, as the most viable solution requires a supernaturalist framework. Conversely, if atheists manage to develop a successful naturalist response to the problem, traditional theists could adopt it, as theists’ supernaturalist ontology encompasses naturalist ontologies. If my argument holds, the problem of evil should no longer be viewed as a challenge exclusive to traditional theists; it may, in fact, present an even greater challenge for atheists.

Visit Yujin Nagasawa's website.

--Marshal Zeringue

Susan Doran's "From Tudor to Stuart"

Susan Doran is Professor of Early Modern British History, University of Oxford, and Senior Research Fellow, Jesus College, University of Oxford.

Doran's academic career at the University of Oxford started in 2002, with teaching posts first at Christ Church and then at St Benet's Hall, Regent's Park College, and St John's College. Since 2008 she has been a Senior Research Fellow at Jesus College, Oxford, and in 2016 the University awarded her a Professorship. She has written extensively on the Tudors, especially Elizabeth I, and worked with curators to edit catalogues of four major exhibitions in London.

Doran applied the "Page 99 Test" to her new book, From Tudor to Stuart: The Regime Change from Elizabeth I to James I, and reported the following:

Given its size and remit, From Tudor to Stuart could hardly be summarized in one page. Nevertheless the Page 99 Test works well since it makes two statements crucial to Part I of the book, which has as its focus how James VI of Scotland came to succeed Elizabeth I and what problems he faced during his first year as king of England. The first statement is that James’s successful accession on 24 March 1603 occurred only because he was the "last credible heir standing" and no other potential claimants challenged his title. As I explain on page 99, the putative claims of Lord Beauchamp (the great-great grandson of Henry VII), Arbella Stuart (Henry VII’s great granddaughter), and the Infanta of Spain came to nothing.

My second statement on page 99 is that James’s title to the English throne was "plainly dubious" since he was “not the direct heir by statute nor of the queen’s body”. Previously, I describe how and why the English privy council had pretty much elected James but tried to present him as the legitimate hereditary king as well as Elizabeth’s nominated heir. Towards the end of page 99, I tell how the mayor and aldermen of the City of London attempted the same when the proclamation announcing James’s accession was brought to Ludgate and the Tower. There they carried out a “public performance which emphasized James’s legitimacy” in order to counter any opposing views. Later on in the chapter, I demonstrate how the public responded to the confusion concerning James's constitutional position.

Of course, there were other problems that James faced in 1603 – Elizabeth’s legacy, new conspiracies and plague – all of which are discussed on other pages of Part 1, but the uncertainty concerning James’s right to the throne is something I wanted highlighted in the book, and it is clearly there on page 99.

The remainder of the book (Parts 2 and 3) addresses another issue: was James I a different kind of ruler from Elizabeth and was 1603 a watershed in English history? Here I look at the personnel in the court and council, the continued repression of puritans and Catholics, new policies such as union with Scotland, the successful implementation of the Elizabethan drive for overseas colonies and plantations in Ireland, and much else.

Learn more about From Tudor to Stuart at the Oxford University Press website.

--Marshal Zeringue

Paul M. McGarr's "Spying in South Asia"

Paul M. McGarr is Lecturer in Intelligence Studies at King's College London and author of The Cold War in South Asia, 1945–1965.

He applied the "Page 99 Test" to his new book, Spying in South Asia: Britain, the United States, and India's Secret Cold War, and reported the following:

Page 99 of my book describes the extent to which the Central Intelligence agency (CIA) developed a large and active presence in Cold War India. The CIA operated several stations, or bases of operation, in India that were concerned not only with espionage, or undercovering the secrets of the Indian government and Eastern bloc missions in the subcontinent, but also covert action, or hidden activity conducted to influence political events. Page 99 details how, somewhat paradoxically, and following the outbreak of a brief and bloody war between India and China over a contested Himalayan border, the Indian government turned to the CIA to help it gather intelligence on its Chinese adversary and conduct paramilitary operations intended to destabilise China’s borderlands and occupy Beijing’s security forces.

Appropriately, page 99 provides a clear insight into a central theme in my book. Namely, the complicated, often conflicted, and ultimately counterproductive secret relationship between the CIA and Indian governments during the Cold War. In many ways, page 99 encapsulates in a few short paragraphs the essence of the nearly hundred pages that proceed it and the two hundred or so pages that follow. These expand upon and illuminate the interventions that foreign intelligence services, in the form of the CIA, Britian’s secret agencies, and Soviet bloc bodies, such as the KGB and GRU, undertook in India and the significant and enduring impact these have had on the political and social fabric of South Asia. The spectre of a ‘foreign hand’, or external intelligence activity, real and imagined, has come to occupy a prominent place in India’s contemporary political discourse, journalism, and cultural production. Spying in South Asia sets out how the nexus between intelligence and statecraft in the subcontinent and the relationships forged between external secret agencies and India’s governments to promote democracy came to be associated at all levels of Indian society with covert action, grand conspiracy, and justifications for repression. In doing so, my book uncovers the ongoing and troubling legacy of a fifty-year Cold War battle for hearts and minds in the Indian subcontinent.

Learn more about Spying in South Asia at the Cambridge University Press website.

--Marshal Zeringue

Julie Guthman's "The Problem with Solutions"

Julie Guthman is a geographer and Professor of Community Studies at the University of California, Santa Cruz. Her books include Wilted: Pathogens, Chemicals, and the Fragile Future of the Strawberry Industry.

Guthman applied the "Page 99 Test" to her new book, The Problem with Solutions: Why Silicon Valley Can't Hack the Future of Food, and reported the following:

If you turned to page 99 of my book you would first encounter a discussion of Confined Animal Feeding Operations (CAFOs), explaining how they produce cheap human food at a huge cost to animal welfare and the workers who keep the animals alive and reproducing. The text then zooms out to claim how issues with protein production are implicated in several of the grand challenges that supposedly animate Silicon Valley’s entry into agriculture and food. That means, as I write, that so-called “alternative proteins” – those designed to substitute for animal products – “carry a lot of weight for the entire sector in terms of delivering its much ballyhooed impact.”

Page 99 gives you a pretty good idea of what the book is about. For it illustrates that many past agri-food technologies such as CAFOs, which were designed both to make animal agriculture more efficient but also to protect animals from disease, created some of the problems to which Silicon Valley imagines it can better respond. What page 99 doesn’t quite capture, though, is another major point of the book: that Silicon Valley solutions are not up to the task. They are not only guided too much by the hype and funding culture of Silicon Valley; they generally misunderstand the character of food system problems, providing instead overly simple, techno-approaches to deeply complex and fundamentally political problems. It is not clear, for example, that bioengineered plant-based substitutes for burgers are less resource intensive than conventional meat production, inasmuch as they are undoubtedly more humane. And it is far from clear that producing animal product substitutes for the vegan-curious undermines the worst of animal agriculture, as more regulation might do.

Unfortunately, as I describe in the book, Silicon Valley’s wrong-headed, entrepreneurial solution culture has proliferated far beyond the tech sector, including to universities. As such, students are being trained to come up with and pitch the next “big idea” for making the world a better place, rather than dig into the intellectual and practical work of learning the origins of societal problems and how social movements have or can respond to them. Action without reflection and humility is no way to fix food – or anything else of critical importance to life on earth.

Learn more about The Problem with Solutions at the University of California Press website.

The Page 99 Test: Wilted.

--Marshal Zeringue

Petra R. Rivera-Rideau's "Fitness Fiesta!"

Petra R. Rivera-Rideau is Associate Professor of American Studies at Wellesley College and author of Remixing Reggaetón: The Cultural Politics of Race in Puerto Rico.

She applied the "Page 99 Test" to her new book, Fitness Fiesta!: Selling Latinx Culture through Zumba, and reported the following:

Page 99 of my book, Fitness Fiesta! Selling Latinx Culture through Zumba, has three screenshots from a commercial called “Let it Move You.” This 2014 marketing campaign advertised Zumba Fitness, a Latin-based dance-fitness program. Many people lauded “Let It Move You” as a progressive campaign featuring people with diverse body types and backgrounds. The three stills on page 99 show a traffic cop, a food truck customer, and an office worker who all spontaneously start to do their Zumba moves at inappropriate times.

Most US fitness programs embrace a “feel the burn” mentality and muscular physique. In contrast, Zumba Fitness’s slogan is “Ditch the workout, join the party!” Page 99 is in a chapter called “Selling Fun” that shows how “fun” in Zumba is intimately tied to racial hierarchies that depict whiteness as disciplined and intelligent, and racial others as instinctual and primitive. Fitness Fiesta! analyzes “tropicalized Latinness,” that is, a top-down construction of “Latin” culture as something carefree, exotic, and hypersexual. In this context, the trope of fun presents Zumba as a space where anything goes, thus implying that Latin culture is completely uninhibited and different from the US mainstream.

The three photos on page 99 illustrate this perfectly. The premise of the commercial is that Zumba Fitness is so irresistible that you won’t be able to stop moving and having fun, even if it is inconvenient or dangerous. One photo on page 99 shows the traffic cop abandoning her duties to dance causing a car wreck. The other two photos show women dancing provocatively. A woman at a food truck does a “booty pop” where she juts out her behind and jumps backwards, disrupting the orderly line. Lastly, the office worker climbs on top of the conference table and slides across it, grabbing her male coworker’s tie and staring lustily into his eyes. These moves conform to the hypersexualized “Latin lover” stereotype that has been endemic throughout US popular culture for decades.

Overall, the photos on page 99 demonstrate an important part of my argument that Latinness is constructed as foreign, exotic, and primitive. But they do not capture a central tenet of the book. Zumba Fitness presents cultural appreciation as central to its ethos even though it also embraces stereotypes of Latinos and Latin culture. Fitness Fiesta! argues that this contradiction mirrors the dangerous assumption that the US is a “postracial” society devoid of racism, when in actuality systemic racism remains pervasive. Page 99 doesn’t grasp this full argument, but it is a good visual representation of tropicalized Latinness in the Zumba Fitness universe.

Learn more about Fitness Fiesta! at the Duke University Press website.

--Marshal Zeringue

Richard E. Mshomba's "Africa and Preferential Trade"

Richard E. Mshomba is Professor Emeritus of Economics at La Salle University. Born and raised in Arusha, Tanzania, he received a Ph.D. in economics from the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. He is the author of Africa in the Global Economy (2000), Africa and the World Trade Organization (2009), and Economic Integration in Africa (2017).

Mshomba applied the "Page 99 Test" to his new book, Africa and Preferential Trade: An Unpredictable Path for Development, and reported the following:

Here are the two full paragraphs on page 99 [sources removed]:

The other countries in the Central African group have little to gain from an EU–Central Africa EPA. Chad, the Central African Republic, and São Tomé and Principe are LDCs with access to the [Everything But Arms] EBA program. São Tomé and Principe will be removed from the EBA program in 2024 when it graduates from the LDC category. However, merchandise exports contribute only 3–4 percent of São Tomé and Principe’s GDP. While 70 percent of those exports are destined to the EU, only about 30 percent of those are eligible for the EBA. The rest take advantage of the zero [Most Favored Nation] MFN rate, that is, the duty-free rate for everyone. It is unlikely São Tomé and Principe would sign on to an EPA just so that exports that contribute only one percent of its GDP would have duty-free access. Moreover, São Tomé and Principe is an insignificant market for the EU.

The Republic of Congo qualifies for the EU GSP program. Gabon and Equatorial Guinea do not qualify for the EU GSP because they are in the upper-middle-income category. For all these countries, more than 97 percent of their exports are raw minerals and other products that face zero MFN duties. In 2020, the last year that Equatorial Guinea could have taken advantage of being an LDC, it was not even able (or did not bother) to take advantage of its one percent of exports to the EU that was eligible for the EBA. Unless the EU is willing to give substantial financial aid to these others members of the Central Africa Group as an incentive to join, what is now referred to as the “EU–Central Africa (Cameroon) Economic Partnership Agreement” will, in effect, remain just the EU- Cameroon Economic Partnership Agreement for a long time.

Page 99 highlights some of the differences between African countries, but it does not capture the main point of the book, which is to caution countries on non-reciprocal preferential trade arrangements.

* * *
In this book Mshomba provides analysis on how African countries have or have not benefited from non-reciprocal trade arrangements with the European Union, the US, and China. Mshomba also presents a systematic analysis of Economic Partnership Agreements (EPAs) negotiations for each negotiating group in Africa by examining the specific features of countries in each group. He provides an in-depth discussion on why some countries have been quick to embrace EPAs while others have been ambivalent or outright against them.

According to a famous proverb, “give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day. Teach a man to fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.” Non-reciprocal preferential trade arrangements neither “give a man a fish” nor “teach a man how to fish.” Rather, they offer the promise of a market in which to sell one’s fish. That is, these arrangements encourage preference-receiving countries to “teach themselves how to fish” and to “go fishing on their own,” with the non-binding promise that they will have a market for the fish they are able to catch and sell.

Special and preferential trade arrangements provide opportunities for developing countries to expand their export sector and, potentially, grow their economies. But they are only opportunities. The utilization of these arrangements and the benefits derived from them depend on many factors, both external and internal. The magnitude of the margins of preference, the reliability of the preferences, and the rule-of-origin provisions are among the key external determinants. Internally, the domestic capacity to expand the production of exports depends on political stability, investment policies, access to credit, the quality and reliability of infrastructure, and opportunities for backward and forward linkages in production.

Warning against overreliance on preferential trade arrangements, Mshomba explains that these arrangements must be seen as a ‘borrowed” tool whose life span is not certain. Between 2015 and 2023, 18 African counties had been suspended from the U.S. African Growth and Opportunity Act for different periods of time. As such, long-term development cannot be made based on it without discounting its future. Of course, when available, these preferential trade arrangements can be used in conjunction with other development tools to expand and diversify the export sector and, in turn, be a source of economic development.

Learn more about Africa and Preferential Trade at the Stanford University Press website.

--Marshal Zeringue

Emily M. Farris and Mirya R. Holman's "The Power of the Badge"

Emily M. Farris is associate professor of political science and core faculty of comparative race and ethnic studies at Texas Christian University. Mirya R. Holman is associate professor at the Hobby School of Public Affairs at the University of Houston. She is the author of Women in Politics in the American City and coeditor of Good Reasons to Run.

They applied the "Page 99 Test" to their new book, The Power of the Badge: Sheriffs and Inequality in the United States, and reported the following:

Page 99 of our book starts the section of our book entitled “Professionalism and Bias in Police Stops” and details the interaction between a mail carrier and a sheriff in Piece County, Washington.

Around 2 am on January 27, 2021, Sedrick Altheimer was delivering newspapers in Pierce County, Washington, when Ed Troyer, the county’s recently elected sheriff, began to follow him in an SUV. After a verbal confrontation where the sheriff cornered Altheimer for driving in and out of driveways, Sheriff Troyer called the police and informed dispatch that Altheimer “threatened to kill me,” prompting a massive police response, with more than 40 police and sheriff cars rushing to the scene. According to testimony from a Tacoma police officer, Troyer later told police he was not threatened by Altheimer. Sheriff Troyer insisted the incident had “nothing to do with [Altheimer] being Black,” but an independent investigation called by the county council found the sheriff exhibited “improper bias” (Brunner and Kamb 2021a; Moran and McDowell 2021) . Following the incident, the Washington State attorney general filed criminal charges against the sheriff for false reporting, and Altheimer filed a lawsuit against the county for damages due to emotional distress from “racial profiling, false arrest and unnecessary use of excessive force of this man whose only crime was ‘being a black man in a white neighborhood.’’’¹ Sheriff Troyer was eventually found not guilty of filing a false report (Brunner 2022b) , even as an investigation by a former U.S. Attorney (authorized by the county) found that the sheriff violated policies on bias free policing (Brunner and Kamb 2021b) . At the same time these events were playing out, three Black deputies in the Pierce County Sheriff’s office won a settlement for over one million dollars in June 2022, accusing the office of pervasive sexism and racism in hiring, management, and promotion practices (Adams 2021), and the office faced another lawsuit from a deputy in 2022 with additional accusations of sexism (Ramirez 2022).
¹While awaiting trial for the criminal charges, a judge found the sheriff violated conditions of his release as he had repeatedly contact Altheimer or asked other law enforcement to do so. The judge order Troyer to post a $100,000 bail and abide by the no-contact and anti-harassment orders (Brunner 2022a).

Page 99 is an excellent representation of the content of the book: in it, we focus on how sheriffs, who are locally elected law enforcement officers, often engage in bad (and racist) behavior and are rarely held accountable for that behavior. One of the main foci of the book is on how sheriffs and their deputies have discretion in the enforcement of the law, particularly around traffic laws. Is it illegal to pull into driveways in a neighborhood where you don’t live? Probably not, but also probably! The set of laws available for enforcement are wide and deep and easily applied or not.

The chapter in which we find page 99 is core to the book: do the attitudes that sheriffs have about groups, including women, people of color, and immigrants, shape their office’s policies? In short, yes. Sheriffs that have more positive views towards women instruct their deputies to connect victims of domestic and interpersonal violence to social services and care. Sheriffs who hold more positive views towards Black people report high rates of training their staff to avoid racial biases. And sheriffs with positive attitudes towards immigrants are less likely to check the immigration status of victims of crimes and witnesses to crimes.

Our book draws attention to sheriffs as an office that has a long history, a powerful role in American politics, and yet is often ignored in discussions of politics, representation, and accountability. In The Power of the Badge, we attempt to remedy some of this oversight by highlighting what sheriffs think and do and why that matters.

Learn more about The Power of the Badge at the University of Chicago Press website.

--Marshal Zeringue

Michael J. Douma's "The Slow Death of Slavery in Dutch New York"

Michael J. Douma is an Associate Professor in the McDonough School of Business at Georgetown University, where he is the Director of the Georgetown Institute for the Study of Markets and Ethics.

Douma applied the "Page 99 Test" to his new book, The Slow Death of Slavery in Dutch New York: A Cultural, Economic, and Demographic History, 1700–1827, and reported the following:

Page 99 of my book is part of a description about how I converted colonial New York pounds into U.S. dollars and used a consumer price index to consider the effects of inflation on these currencies over time. I'd say the Page 99 Test is not particularly useful for my book, since this is one of the more technical sections of one of the more economics-loaded chapters, which might not appeal to all readers. However, the page does indicate the kind of rigor that went into the book. It is a chapter on slave prices in New York and New Jersey, and how to calculate the average values that New Yorkers assigned to their enslaved people. The page is interesting, as well, because "we" (I brought in a co-author, economist Michael Makovi, for this chapter), produce a novel way to measure the value of the New York pound that doesn't use the British pound as an intermediary, as previous economic historians have done. Yet, at the same time, the chapter relies on previous well-known work by John J. McCusker. The book's subtitle is "A Cultural, Economic, and Demographic History, 1700-1827." This is one of the more economics-focused chapters, while two others deal mainly with demographics and the rest of the book is concerned with cultural history. However, these approaches to the past overlap in many ways, and as I argue in the book, they complement each other well.

Visit Michael J. Douma's website.

--Marshal Zeringue

Lee Phillips's "Einstein's Tutor"

After receiving his PhD in theoretical physics from Dartmouth College and completing his postdoctoral work, Lee Phillips worked for 22 years as a research physicist at the Naval Research Laboratory. For the past decade he has pursued a career as freelance writer, publishing widely in popular science journals. Phillips lives in Honduras, where he writes and conducts research while studying Spanish.

Phillips applied the "Page 99 Test" to his new book, Einstein's Tutor: The Story of Emmy Noether and the Invention of Modern Physics, and reported the following:

Page 99 of Einstein’s Tutor happens to be the last page of Chapter 2 (“Gravity”); as it ends a chapter it’s not a full page, but fills about 3/4 of the space.

On this page we see Albert Einstein taking stock of his mood and situation about a year and a half after completing his greatest work, the General Theory of Relativity, the edifice that still stands as our explanation for gravity and all the phenomena related to it, such as black holes and gravitational waves. At this point in the theory’s career it has impressed the community of physicists and mathematicians by virtue of its unique beauty and coherence, and its ability to resolve some existing puzzles—however it has not faced the ultimate test of new physics, the prediction and confirmation of new phenomena. But Einstein is working on this, and hopes that his theory can be put to the test in the near future.

The page ends with a foreshadowing of the astronomical confirmation that would make Einstein a celebrity. It then points out how this fame would indirectly help to keep the central idea of the book, Noether’s Theorem, on life support long enough for it to become the foundation of the next major development in theoretical physics. The reader is informed that the following chapter will explain what this idea is.

Page 99 is not a bad representation of the tone and substance of the book as a whole. It mentions two of its major characters, and ties together several crucial developments. It’s a pivot: an assessment of the past and the present moment in the historical arc of the book, and a turn to the future. If a reader suffers a violent dyspepsia upon reading page 99, he or she should probably put the book down. But if you enjoy this page, there’s a good chance you will enjoy the whole thing.

I began this journey with a desire to describe the beauty and importance of Noether’s Theorem and its travels though the history of ideas. My research into the Theorem led me to the amazing journeys of Emmy Noether and the people around her. Exploration of archival materials uncovered the story of Noether’s time in America, and to a wealth of details about her life and death that told a story that had never been told before. I never imagined that my desire to explain a physics idea would lead to a tale so filled with drama, pain, heroism, hope, and humor. I am excited to share these discoveries with the world.

Visit Lee Phillips's website.

--Marshal Zeringue

Mel Stanfill's "Fandom Is Ugly"

Media studies scholar Mel Stanfill researches how individuals interact with various media forms, ranging from television to social platforms. Their work explores the intersections of technology, identity, law and economics in shaping cultural access and interpretation.

Stanfill applied the "Page 99 Test" to their new book, Fandom Is Ugly: Networked Harassment in Participatory Culture, and reported the following:

On page 99 of Fandom is Ugly, I discuss how fans who engaged in a large-scale Twitter campaign (#LexaDeservedBetter) to protest the killing off of lesbian character Lexa on CW show The 100 did not have the same level of concern for Lincoln, a Black man character who was killed off the following week. In particular, while there were also Twitter campaigns to complain about his death (#LincolnDeservedBetter), and to point to the combination of the two deaths as undermining the show’s inclusion of marginalized people (minorities are not disposable, without a hashtag), most tweets from the supporters of Lexa did not engage substantively with Lincoln’s death, prioritizing the white lesbian and using Lincoln only to support that cause.

Overall, I do think that page 99 provides good insight into what Fandom is Ugly talks about. One of the book’s key interventions is to push back on the longstanding and widespread assumption that fandom is progressive, a view held by both many scholars and many fans. Such arguments are rooted in a sense that fandom is resistant—whether to media industries in particular or norms in general. This resistance is particularly acute around hegemonies of gender and sexuality. This argument isn’t wrong. Fans are progressive and resistant to various hegemonies. But it’s not the entire story—fans are reactionary and shore up hegemony at least as often, and this case of white queer people failing to take racism seriously shows this clearly.

Another key intervention of the book is to resist the ways media and consumption and pleasure continue to be seen as frivolous and unimportant, both unworthy of study and irrelevant to matters of broad social importance. Through thinking of fandom as having three basic characteristics—public, collective affect, or feels; public, collective interpretation of shared text(s); and identity and community formation structured by affective ties and texts—Fandom Is Ugly is able to think about how these factors are at work in many kinds of ugly public culture, from the January 6 riots to the moral panic around Critical Race Theory. The book takes up fandom as both a site of articulation of power and a mode of articulation of power. It asks both about how fandom as traditionally understood reflects and refracts broader relations of power—and, specifically, domination—and how we understand those broader relations of power better when we look at them with the tools of fan studies.

Visit Mel Stanfill's website.

--Marshal Zeringue