Doran's academic career at the University of Oxford started in 2002, with teaching posts first at Christ Church and then at St Benet's Hall, Regent's Park College, and St John's College. Since 2008 she has been a Senior Research Fellow at Jesus College, Oxford, and in 2016 the University awarded her a Professorship. She has written extensively on the Tudors, especially Elizabeth I, and worked with curators to edit catalogues of four major exhibitions in London.
Doran applied the "Page 99 Test" to her new book, From Tudor to Stuart: The Regime Change from Elizabeth I to James I, and reported the following:
Given its size and remit, From Tudor to Stuart could hardly be summarized in one page. Nevertheless the Page 99 Test works well since it makes two statements crucial to Part I of the book, which has as its focus how James VI of Scotland came to succeed Elizabeth I and what problems he faced during his first year as king of England. The first statement is that James’s successful accession on 24 March 1603 occurred only because he was the "last credible heir standing" and no other potential claimants challenged his title. As I explain on page 99, the putative claims of Lord Beauchamp (the great-great grandson of Henry VII), Arbella Stuart (Henry VII’s great granddaughter), and the Infanta of Spain came to nothing.Learn more about From Tudor to Stuart at the Oxford University Press website.
My second statement on page 99 is that James’s title to the English throne was "plainly dubious" since he was “not the direct heir by statute nor of the queen’s body”. Previously, I describe how and why the English privy council had pretty much elected James but tried to present him as the legitimate hereditary king as well as Elizabeth’s nominated heir. Towards the end of page 99, I tell how the mayor and aldermen of the City of London attempted the same when the proclamation announcing James’s accession was brought to Ludgate and the Tower. There they carried out a “public performance which emphasized James’s legitimacy” in order to counter any opposing views. Later on in the chapter, I demonstrate how the public responded to the confusion concerning James's constitutional position.
Of course, there were other problems that James faced in 1603 – Elizabeth’s legacy, new conspiracies and plague – all of which are discussed on other pages of Part 1, but the uncertainty concerning James’s right to the throne is something I wanted highlighted in the book, and it is clearly there on page 99.
The remainder of the book (Parts 2 and 3) addresses another issue: was James I a different kind of ruler from Elizabeth and was 1603 a watershed in English history? Here I look at the personnel in the court and council, the continued repression of puritans and Catholics, new policies such as union with Scotland, the successful implementation of the Elizabethan drive for overseas colonies and plantations in Ireland, and much else.
--Marshal Zeringue
Posts
